As of SWI-Prolog version 7, the system supports compound terms
that have no arguments. This implies that e.g., name() is
valid syntax. This extension aims at functions on dicts (see section
5.4) as well as the implementation of domain specific languages
(DSLs). To minimise the consequences, the classic predicates functor/3
and =../2 have not been
modified. The predicates compound_name_arity/3
and
compound_name_arguments/3
have been added. These predicates operate only on compound terms and
behave consistently for compounds with zero arguments. Code that generalises
a term using the sequence below should generally be changed to use compound_name_arity/3.
...,
functor(Specific, Name, Arity),
functor(General, Name, Arity),
...,
Replacement of =../2 by compound_name_arguments/3 is typically needed to deal with code that follow the skeleton below.
...,
Term0 =.. [Name|Args0],
maplist(convert, Args0, Args),
Term =.. [Name|Args],
...,
For predicates, goals and arithmetic functions (evaluable terms), <name> and <name>() are equivalent. Below are some examples that illustrate this behaviour.
go() :- format('Hello world~n').
?- go().
Hello world
?- go.
Hello world
?- Pi is pi().
Pi = 3.141592653589793.
?- Pi is pi.
Pi = 3.141592653589793.
Note that the canonical representation of predicate heads
and functions without arguments is an atom. Thus, clause(go(),
Body) returns the clauses for go/0 , but clause(-Head,
-Body, +Ref) unifies Head with an atom if the clause
specified by
Ref is part of a predicate with zero arguments.